Guaranteed remediation after a security audit
An independent security audit only has value when the findings are actually addressed afterward. That is why our guarantees define how we handle delivery issues that come out of such an audit.
Audit findings are not left hanging
Free recovery according to the agreements made
Technical follow-up with clear priorities
What we mean by this
Following up audit findings
If an independent Glossary · In briefsecurity auditA security audit is a structured examination of a digital system's security. The auditor assesses technical measures and processes against agreed requirements and records findings.Read more identifies delivery issues within the agreed Glossary · In briefscopeScope defines the boundaries of a project or assignment: which goals, activities and results are included and which are excluded.Read more of the project, we fix them free of charge. That turns audit findings into concrete improvements to the delivered software.
That guarantee only works when it is also clear what the audit covers. Findings on the delivered solution are ours to address. New wishes, extra hardening outside the original agreement, or a fundamentally different scope require a new decision. That keeps security concrete and checkable.
How the follow-up runs
From audit to recovery
An external audit makes visible where risks or shortcomings sit in the delivered software or infrastructure within the agreements made.
For each finding, we assess the cause, the urgency, and what change is needed to solve the issue properly.
If the finding falls under the agreed audit and the delivered scope, we carry out the recovery free of charge.
After recovery, we make clear what changed, so it can be checked again whether the issue is truly resolved.
The audit guarantee does not stand alone. It connects to the way we already organize quality, deployments, and operational follow-up.
Independent review
Findings on the table
An external audit makes visible where risks or shortcomings sit in the delivered software or infrastructure within the agreements made.
Why this matters
Confidence for software that has to keep running
With business-critical software, security is not only a technical concern but also a continuity issue. A finding that stays unresolved quickly becomes an operational risk. That is why it matters that the party that built the system not only participates in the audit, but also takes responsibility for the result.
You can also see that in projects where ownership, transferability, and technical discipline matter heavily, such as Zetprofiel. There, Glossary · In brieftest coverageTest coverage measures which parts of the code execute during automated tests. It can count lines, functions and branches, among other things.Read more, Glossary · In briefCI/CDCI/CD is a way of working in which teams frequently merge software changes, check them automatically and use a defined sequence of steps to prepare or deploy them to production.Read more, and infrastructure in the client's name are not loose details but part of a controllable foundation.
What this gives you
An audit that leads to concrete follow-up
Free recovery of agreed security findings
Insight into cause, priority, and solution
Less chance that security issues keep lingering
Frequently asked questions
No. This guarantee applies when an independent audit is part of the agreements made or logically follows from the project.
No. The guarantee covers findings within the agreed audit and scope, not automatically every additional security request or every new measure outside that agreement.
Because security is only credible when the follow-up to findings is arranged as well. Otherwise, an audit mostly stays paperwork.
Maintenance and support deal with structural follow-up after go-live. The audit guarantee specifically covers fixing audit findings that surface around delivery.
Is your question not listed here?
Get in touch